International Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Sciences, 2019, 8, 1, 17-20.
DOI: 10.5530/ijpcs.2019.8.4
Published: January 2019
Type: Research Article
Authors: Yousef Ahmed Alomi, and Hajer Yousef Almudaiheem
Author(s) affiliations: Yousef Ahmed Alomi 1,* , Hajer Yousef Almudaiheem 2 1 The Former General Manager of General Administration of Pharmaceutical Care Head, National Clinical pharmacy and pharmacy practice, the past head and founder, Research Consult and Pharmacy Consult, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA.
2 General Administration of Pharmaceutical Care, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA.
Objective: Since January 2013, the national drug information center (NDIC) has started providing services and since December 2013, it is answering all the public and professional inquiries made through the Ministry of Health (MOH)-Hotline Calling Services (937). Therefore, in this study, we explored the cost avoidance analysis of national drug information inquiries by the hotline services in Saudi Arabia. Methods: We simulated the drug information inquiries related to the adults and children for the duration of 12 months of 2014 through MOH-hotline calling services (937). At least 10 on-call clinical pharmacists and expert trained pharmacists were receiving calls made from public and professionals inquiring about drug information. The data were collected in the drug information data collecting form through manual documentation system of drug information inquiries. Results: The drug information pharmacist implicated that the high-cost avoidance at the public side came from the dose standardization (30,310 USD (37.5%)) of the total cost avoidance followed by the drug administration and adverse drug reaction (16,532 USD (20.45%) and 9,347.5 USD (11.56%), respectively), which represent more than 50% of the total cost avoidance from the public side. With regard to professional inquiries, the drug information pharmacist implicated that the highest cost avoidance was through inquiries related to drugs in pregnancy, which was around 7,527.50 USD (26%) of the total cost followed by the drug administration, drug–drug interaction and drug identification (4,792 USD (16.5%); 4,141.50 USD (14.3%); and 4,135.50 USD (14.2%), respectively), which represent more than 50% of the total cost avoidance from the professional side. Conclusion: NDIC was the first in calculating cost avoidance from answering drug information inquiries from professional and public separately in the Middle Eastern countries. It is highly implicated in the drug information services in the healthcare organization in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Keywords: Cost, Drug Information Center, Efficiency, Hotline, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia